Jump to content

Why do metal music fans believe in dinosaurs?


CADministry

Recommended Posts

Iceni and ban plus the fact man. Did exist during the dinosaur days there know as cavemen. Plus when you look at. Crocodiles and alligators. They are an example. Of dinosaurs. That still live among us. And also. Elephants. Are descending. From. Masdons and wooly mammoths Our. Big cats like tigers. And. Lions. Came from saber tooth Tigers. Orgin Sharks came from meglodon the giant shark. All those creatures. Came from dinosaurs I watch a lot of history read it about a lot. If dinosaurs are myth. Like he said they are. Then our animal life of today are myths then. you guys agree with me
Well... as far as alagaters and such like, I believe that the original poster is correct that it's never been suggested that they are related to dinosaurs which were not reptiles, so lizards turtles and snakes are not close dinosaur relitives either and definatly not decended. Birds are with their warmer matabolisms and more importantly their hips are decended from dinosaurs. I do not know, and am apparenly too lazy to look it up, but I think that dinosaurs evolved from amphibians, and my better informed brother who is visiting backs up my understanding that dinosaurs and reptiles evolved seperatly from a common amphibian ancestor no longer extant. Sharks are a kind of fish, and a primitive sort at that. Mammals are decened from early dinosaurs and we have a hip more like a birds than a reptiles. so humans are from a fish-amphibian-dinosaur line, thats my understanding, no reptile ancestors in our line so I think you're right about that Deathstorm in terms of mammals coming from dinosaurs. Reptiles like allagaters are not descended from dinosaurs. Fish, such as sharks, predate amphibians.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How about this? Give us conclusive proof that dinosaurs did not exist and/or proof that all evidence of the existence of dinosaurs is false. Also I would like to point out that birds did not evolve from lizards. Lizards evolved alongside the dinosaurs, but weren't too closely related. When you look at the structure of dinosaur, lizard and bird skeletons, you will notice that the skeletons of modern birds are very similar to dinosaur skeletons (particularly the dinosaurs in theornithischia group... it's in the name). As well as this, all lizards that have either a sprawling, or semi-erect gait, whereas all known dinosaurs have a pillar-erect or erect gait. The only real similarity in the bone structure of lizards and dinosaurs is that they are all anapsids, but then, so are snakes (and technically birds). Do I also need to explain how Feathered dinosaurs evolved before birds but after scaled dinosaurs (at around the same time "modern" lizards were evolving? Next time you go on a forum where no one knows who the heck you are, I would at least check who you are speaking to before you started giving ill-founded lectures that go against what is generally accepted as scientific fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I also add that chances are that on a forum this large, there are multiple people who have an in depth knowledge of the subject matter. Or at the very least, people studying/have studied related subjects at various levels (I myself have a level 3 diploma (equivalent to an A-level in the UK - I don't know what the equivalent level is in other countries) in herpetology and intend to go on to do a masters degree in zoology). p.s. sorry about the double post p.p.s. How do dinosaurs stick out like a saw thumb? Fossils of sloths the size of bears have been discovered. As well as various other oddities, such as the plesiosaurs, pliosaurs and the quetzalcoatlus (the largest flying creature ever discovered). p.p.p.s. Sorry, I just realised this post has no point to it whatsoever and just serves to make me look like a giant douche. My point is that you really need to make sure you know what you are talking about when you start a debate (I wouldn't call this an argument as it has stayed fairly civil) with people you do not know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resorting to ad hominems is the sign of a person so closed-minded that they won't even start to consider other points of view. In general terms to reply to some of the other earlier comments: - Yes, paleontology is largely fraudulent, specifically dino-paleontology. It's such a small field though, and those involved have so much invested in protecting the lie, that there is little chance to get them to admit the truth. They would have too much to lose. - Crocodiles and alligators are not claimed to be close relatives of any particular dinosaur. Crocs are reptiles, whereas we're told to believe that dinosaurs were able to self-regulate their temperatures and in many cases had feathers. We're also supposed to believe that enormous creatures like the powerful Tyrannosaur was made extinct by an event that allowed chickens to survive. Chickens are rubbish, I could kill a chicken in a second. - I am not a Young Earth Creationist, neither are most of the core members of Christians Against Dinosaurs. In general we believe the literature of science, including evolution. Personally I accept that evolution is a thing that happens, and that the Bible is largely metaphorical. As it says in Eastern Philosophy, 'the tao that can be described is not the true tao', and likewise the Bible needs to use allusion and metaphor to illustrate truths that cannot be put into human language. - Occult symbolism is of little concern to be, the symbols are just representative of a darker evil. A darker evil that had any of you edgy metallists ever actually experienced, you would stop flirting with. The power of light can banish this darkness, so it doesn't matter to me in the slightest if people choose to decorate themselves with Baphomets and the like. From a purely artistic perspective, I quite like the Baphomet. Plus its origins aren't really Satanic, it's more to do with Pagan fertility rites. Not exactly upholding Christian values, but there's a lot worse in the world.
Their reply was probably the most apt for your nonsense compared to some of the other somewhat rambling responses. Please go away and take your bullcrap along too. You are exactly the kind of reason I despise most religions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iceni and ban plus the fact man. Did exist during the dinosaur days there know as cavemen. Plus when you look at. Crocodiles and alligators. They are an example. Of dinosaurs. That still live among us. And also. Elephants. Are descending. From. Masdons and wooly mammoths Our. Big cats like tigers. And. Lions. Came from saber tooth Tigers. Orgin Sharks came from meglodon the giant shark. All those creatures. Came from dinosaurs I watch a lot of history read it about a lot. If dinosaurs are myth. Like he said they are. Then our animal life of today are myths then. you guys agree with me dinosaurs are reptiles. so are gators and crocs.
Dinosaurs and cavemen are separated by something like over a 100,000,000 years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

damn. we're still arguing about dinosaurs in 2015..

I myself have a level 3 diploma (equivalent to an A-level in the UK - I don't know what the equivalent level is in other countries) in herpetology and intend to go on to do a masters degree in zoology)
that's cool man, I was a big snake and other reptile enthusiast growing up, tried my hand at breeding even (under the direction of my father since I was in my early teens) but I love the subject, I've always been fascinated by snakes and have a deep love for them. Did you ever own or breed any reps?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Addressing CAD's query of how chickens could have survived when dinosaurs went extinct. I can say with some certainty that chickens were not around 65 million years ago given there is evidence suggesting only a handful of bird species had evolved at that time. As Iceni pointed out the large size which saw dinosaurs rule the land for some 350 million years was detrimental once food supplies diminished resulting to the change in climate. Mass extinctions have occurred frequently in the Earth's history including at the end of the Pleistocene Epoch when the megafauna and other animals adapted to that climate. As for how dinosaurs could have evolved in the first place there is strong evidence suggesting fish evolved into amphibians (likely to escape natural predators in the seas) and that brach split into reptiles and amphibians. From that branch some reptiles developed fur and became mammals, others evolved into dinosaurs and from then into birds, still others simply optimised the reptilian design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

damn. we're still arguing about dinosaurs in 2015..that's cool man' date=' I was a big snake and other reptile enthusiast growing up, tried my hand at breeding even (under the direction of my father since I was in my early teens) but I love the subject, I've always been fascinated by snakes and have a deep love for them. Did you ever own or breed any reps?[/quote']I have kept and successfully bred Berber Skinks (Eumeces schneideri) and Bibron's geckos (Pachydactylus bibroni). I also keep a variety of amphibians, including Oriental Fire bellied toads (bombina bombina) and Golden reed frogs (Hyperolius puncticulatus). I am currently looking at getting myself a breeding pair of Gran Canaria giant lizard's (Gallotia stehlini). In the past I have kept a few small species of monitor lizard and iguana. I don't have any experience actually owning snakes although I have worked with (and been bitten by) Mangrove snakes (Boiga dendrophila). And who knows what the future may hold (I'm not even old enough to get a driver's licence :() ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be left to assume that you've been trolling here this whole time and delete your account.
But here at Christians Against Dinosaurs
Lol. I assume you haven't tried to google Christians Against Dinosaurs only to find a mere facebook page with some ridiculous photos?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. I assume you haven't tried to google Christians Against Dinosaurs only to find a mere facebook page with some ridiculous photos?
Trolling isn't about being outlandish and idiotic, it's about doing so intentionally to get a rise out of people for you to laugh at. Other than FA's clever mockery, I have yet to hear anything remotely funny go on here, and while I felt that he was blowing smoke up our asses initially, his more recent posts seem to indicate that he actually buys what he's saying.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trolling isn't about being outlandish and idiotic' date=' it's about doing so intentionally to get a rise out of people for you to laugh at. Other than FA's clever mockery, I have yet to hear anything remotely funny go on here, and while I felt that he was blowing smoke up our asses initially, his more recent posts seem to indicate that he actually buys what he's saying.[/quote'] Trolling doesn't have to be clever or funny to qualify as such. And I'd say trolling is actually most effective when the idiotic viewpoint is being presented in enough detail that it comes across to most people as a legitimately held belief. I'm not saying this guy definitely is a troll, but I'm certainly not ready to eliminate that possibility yet. Assuming it is is trolling, whilst I don't find it particularly amusing, this guy is pretty clever to have duped so many people. I'd have to guess that he might have got his info from somewhere else, though; think my friend showed me a satirical website with similar content on it. On that note, I think I might join an atheist/skeptic forum and define atheism as the belief that science has successfully disproved any notion of a God and that all atheists subscribe to the belief system/doctrine of Richard Dawkins. :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. I assume you haven't tried to google Christians Against Dinosaurs only to find a mere facebook page with some ridiculous photos?
I have...I think my favorite had to be the one with the woman making out with the Pachycephalosaurus, as I have no doubt there's a Tumblr blog dedicated to precisely that kind of thing...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have...I think my favorite had to be the one with the woman making out with the Pachycephalosaurus' date=' as I have no doubt there's a Tumblr blog dedicated to precisely that kind of thing...[/quote'] My favorite thing when I was checking out their Facebook page was one of the suggested pages "Dinosaurs against Christians who are against Dinosaurs" I would totally join that group but it was closed :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm new to this forum and to being on forums at all for that matter, but I must say that reading this and some other threads really gives me a good feeling about metalforum.com. The statements of people like Iceni, RelentlessOblivion, FatherAlabaster and Mere are well formulated, well informed and also keep a gentle unprejudiced tone, which is painfully absent elsewhere (youtube ofc, other forums, but irl too). Interesting though that I would find such great comments in a thread started by a rather fundamental and unarguable person. Personally, I found the humor in the opening text rather funny (of course, having not felt offended by it). As it has turned out every time I'm at a gig or metal festival, there are shitloads of stereotypes everywhere, myself included, and we are both drunk as hell, sweaty and horny. And yes I can safely say there are a lot of ungodly Norwegians in clown make-up doing ungodly music releasing videos of themselves being just that too :) I believe that humor can go a long way, as FatherAlabaster proved with the dinosaur pictures. As for the dinosaurs; obviously they are of satanic brood and metal as all hell. They do whatever they want, obey no rules, have horns and make goat sacrifices (see the documentaries "Jurassic Park" and "The Lost World" for proof of my claims). Actually, I even found a new T-rex like species being drunk with my friends last year which we named "Assrapeosaurus". To honor the discovery, we decided to make a papier maché miniature of it and use it as our band mascot. Why, then, do metal music fans (and other people for that matter) believe in dinosaurs? Because they did exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...