Jump to content

Research Report


rgmb

Recommended Posts

Hi, I’m a first year student at Birmingham City University studying Media and Communications (Music Industries) and would really appreciate some help on a research report I am currently doing. I am looking at the representation of rock and metal music in the media and how this representation differs between popular media (tabloid newspapers, the news, popular music websites/magazines) and specialist media (music magazines/websites that specifically focus on rock and metal music.) I am interested in hearing the opinions from fans of a range of genres of music as to whether they feel it is appropriate for rock and metal music to be publicised as widely as other genres of music and why it is often negatively portrayed in the media. Here are some articles that emphasise the difference in representation: Is Marilyn Manson to Blame for the Columbine Killings?) Why no child is safe from the sinister cult of emo | Mail Online Girl, 13, hangs herself after becoming obsessed with Emo 'suicide cult' rock band | Mail Online Kerrang! Police To Record Attacks On Goths, Emos & Punks As Hate Crimes Why Do Metal Bands Always Get Blamed For Violence In America? | The latest music blogs, free MP3s, best new bands, music videos, movie trailers and news analysis Please let me know any thoughts you have on: · Why the different forms of media portray this type of music so differently? · The Daily Mail articles suggest that listening to this type of music is dangerous and can be linked to suicide rates – should a specific genre of music really be blamed for this? · If you agree with The Daily Mail articles, should this genre of music not be publicised in the media? Where do you draw the line of how widely it should be publicised? Just to let you know that I will be referencing everyone anonymously in my research report (person a, person b ect.) and it is strictly for educational purposes – no-one will read the report except me and my tutor. If you are happy to help me out and share your opinion please do so below or in a private message if you would prefer! Thanks for your help :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure what you're after. I don't think the music people listen to is responsible for their behavior. I don't think the arts or print media criticizing them should be censored. I also don't think a survey or poll of public opinion about an oversimplified view of one facet of a complex behavioral, social, and potentially medical issue (adolescent depression) is likely to yield any useful data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, the Daily Mail is just as crap as all the Mock The Week comedians say it is. 80% pathos, 15% tenuous claims, 4% fact and 1% anything even remotely resembling statistical research. They provided absolutely no indication of the research done.To control for other factors they'd have to do an absolutely titanic regression and even if the result is significant the R-squared might not be particularly high. If they ran a correlation they could get statistically significant results but even then a correlation coefficient of less than 0.3 is weak. I would like to see these studies that they vaguely reference, because as it stands now they could just be making stuff up. Controversy sticks with people. Nobody's going to remember Hansi Kusch or Kaisa Jouhki talking about how important JRR Tolkein's literature was in helping them write songs. An interview with a guitar nerd like Frederik Thordenthal or an introspective poet like Michael Akerfelt won't get a lot of attention. But connect one band to a Bible-burning or a kid committing suicide and suddenly you have the eyes of the nation. That's why Akercocke, a band most people have probably never heard of, managed to get an interview on Irish TV- because people were scared of their highly sexualized anti-religious lyrics. Metal is portrayed this way out of laziness more than anything else. I doubt journalists have much of an incentive to look for the 90% of metalheads who are perfectly well-adjusted if a bit foul-tempered at times and anti-clerical - especially considering that most of the viewing public can't be arsed with them either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you both for your replies! Father Alabaster - I'm basically looking for a range of opinions from people with interests in different genres of music on whether they think metal music does impact people in the way some media outlets claim it does. I'm not actually looking into causes for adolescent depression. I'm looking at whether people think it's justified that a certain type of music is being blamed for these issues and comparing the responses from fans of metal music and responses from fans of other genres (eg. pop, indie, dance, R&B ect.). Sorry if I didn't make that clear but hopefully that makes it more understandable. Iceni - I completely agree with you about the Daily Mail! And thanks for your comments on controversy and the examples you gave - I'll definitely look them up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...